This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2014-04-21 |
ABAD, J. |
||||
| Verily, by the unjustified delay in the execution of a final judgment in their favor, the respondent networks have suffered an injustice. The Court views with disfavor the tactics employed by Bancommerce to frustrate the execution of a final decision and order. Once a judgment has become final, the winning party be not, through a mere subterfuge, deprived of the fruits of the verdict.[71] Courts must guard against any scheme calculated to bring about that result and must frown upon any attempt to prolong controversies.[72] As the Court has written in the case of Anama v. PSB, [73] | |||||