Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 158150 2014-09-10	AGRIEX CO. v. TITUS B. VILLANUEVA BERSAMIN, J.
In Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority v. Rodriguez,[45] the Court has already recognized the exclusive jurisdiction of the Bureau of Customs and its officials over seizure cases although the articles were within the Freeport zone, holding: Petitioner alleges that the RTC of Olongapo City has no jurisdiction over the action for injunction and damages filed by respondents on 11 June 2002 as said action is within the exclusive original jurisdiction of the BOC pursuant to Section 602 of Republic Act No. 1937, otherwise known as the "Tariff and Customs Code of the Philippines," as amended. Section 602 provides, thus:
	GR No. 161771 2012-02-15	BANK OF PHILIPPINE ISLANDS v. EDUARDO VILLARAMA, JR., J.
An action for injunction is a suit which has for its purpose the enjoinment of the defendant, perpetually or for a particular time, from the commission or continuance of a specific act, or his compulsion to continue performance of a particular act. It has an independent existence, and is distinct from the ancillary remedy of preliminary injunction which cannot exist except only as a part or an incident of an independent action or proceeding. In an action for injunction, the auxiliary remedy of preliminary injunction, prohibitory or mandatory, may issue.[18]