Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

CAPT. WILFREDO G. ROQUERO v. CHANCELLOR OF UP-MANILA

This case has been cited 4 times or more.

	GR Nos. 164068-69 2013-11-19	ROLANDO P. DE LA CUESTA v. SANDIGANBAYAN ABAD, J.
(f) The PNB check and the corresponding COCOFED official receipt covering the first P3 million of the P6 million PCA "financial assistance" to COCOFED under Board Resolution 128-85.[19]
	GR No. 191411 2013-07-15	RAFAEL L. COSCOLLUELA v. SANDIGANBAYAN PERLAS-BERNABE, J.
This constitutional right is not limited to the accused in criminal proceedings but extends to all parties in all cases, be it civil or administrative in nature, as well as all proceedings, either judicial or quasi-judicial. In this accord, any party to a case may demand expeditious action to all officials who are tasked with the administration of justice.[21]
	GR No. 193706 2013-03-12	EBRENCIO F. INDOYON v. CA SERENO, C.J.
At the outset, we emphasize that a writ of certiorari is an extraordinary prerogative writ that is never demandable as a matter of right.[23] To warrant the issuance thereof, the abuse of discretion must have been so gross or grave, as when there was such capricious and whimsical exercise of judgment equivalent to lack of jurisdiction; or the exercise of power was done in an arbitrary or despotic manner by reason of passion, prejudice, or personal hostility. The abuse must have been committed in a manner so patent and so gross as to amount to an evasion of a positive duty or to a virtual refusal to perform the duty enjoined or to act at all in contemplation of law.[24]
	GR Nos. 189161 & 189173 2012-03-21	JUDGE ADORACION G. ANGELES v. MA. MERCEDITAS N. GUTIERREZ SERENO, J.
Grave abuse of discretion implies such capricious and whimsical exercise of judgment as is equivalent to lack of jurisdiction; or the exercise of power in an arbitrary or despotic manner by reason of passion, prejudice, or personal hostility. The abuse must be in a manner so patent and so gross as to amount to an evasion of a positive duty or to a virtual refusal to perform the duty enjoined or to act at all in contemplation of law.[39]