Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 170904 2013-11-13	BANI RURAL BANK v. TERESA DE GUZMAN BRION, J.
First, when reinstatement is ordered, the general concept under Article 279 of the Labor Code, as amended, computes the backwages from the time of dismissal until the employee's reinstatement. The computation of backwages (and similar benefits considered part of the backwages) can even continue beyond the decision of the labor arbiter or NLRC and ends only when the employee is actually reinstated.[42]
	GR No. 185829 2012-04-25	ARMANDO ALILING v. JOSE B. FELICIANO VELASCO JR., J.
As earlier explained, Aliling cannot be rightfully considered as a mere probationary employee. Accordingly, the probationary period set in the contract of employment dated June 11, 2004 was of no moment. In net effect, as of that date June 11, 2004, Aliling became part of the WWWEC organization as a regular employee of the company without a fixed term of employment. Thus, he is entitled to backwages reckoned from the time he was illegally dismissed on October 6, 2004, with a PhP 17,300.00 monthly salary, until the finality of this Decision. This disposition hews with the Court's ensuing holding in Javellana v. Belen:[40]
	GR No. 185280 2012-01-18	TIMOTEO H. SARONA v. NLRC REYES, J.
A further clarification was made in Javellana, Jr. v. Belen:[64]