Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 199294 2013-07-31	RALPH LITO W. LOPEZ v. PEOPLE CARPIO, J.
Nor can petitioner rely on G.G. Sportswear Mfg. Corp. v. World Class Properties, Inc.[36] to evade criminal liability. That case involved an action for rescission and refund filed before the Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board (HLURB) by a condominium buyer against the developer for breach contract. The HLURB Arbiter rescinded the contract for lack of license of the developer to sell condominium units. The HLURB Board of Commissioners modified the Arbiter's ruling by denying rescission, holding, among others, that the developer's acquisition of license before the filing of the complaint mooted the prayer for rescission. On appeal, this Court affirmed. Here, Primelink never acquired a license to sell from the SEC, unlike in G.G. Sportswear. Thus, G.G. Sportswear is clearly not applicable to the present case.
	GR No. 188986 2013-03-20	GALILEO A. MAGLASANG v. NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY SERENO, C.J.
The question of whether a breach of contract is substantial depends upon the attending circumstances.[15]