You're currently signed in as:
User

VIVIAN Y.IMBUIDO v. NLRC

This case has been cited 5 times or more.

2009-07-03
CARPIO, J.
The principal test for determining whether a particular employee is a project employee or a regular employee is whether the project employee was assigned to carry out a specific project or undertaking, the duration and scope of which were specified at the time the employee is engaged for the project.[18] "Project" may refer to a particular job or undertaking that is within the regular or usual business of the employer, but which is distinct and separate and identifiable as such from the undertakings of the company. Such job or undertaking begins and ends at determined or determinable times.[19]
2007-09-28
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
The principal test for determining whether an employee is a project employee or a regular employee is whether the employment has been fixed for a specific project or undertaking, the completion or termination of which has been determined at the time of the engagement of the employee.[10] A project employee is one whose employment has been fixed for a specific project or undertaking, the completion or termination of which has been determined at the time of the engagement of the employee or where the work or service to be performed is seasonal in nature and the employment is for the duration of the season.[11]  A true project employee should be assigned to a project which begins and ends at determined or determinable times, and be informed thereof at the time of hiring.[12]
2005-08-09
QUISUMBING, J.
Article 95(a) of the Labor Code governs the award of service incentive leave. It provides that every employee who has rendered at least one year of service shall be entitled to a yearly service incentive leave of five days with pay, and Section 3, Rule V, Book III of the Implementing Rules and Regulations, defines the term "at least one year of service" to mean service within 12 months, whether continuous or broken reckoned from the date the employee started working, including authorized absences and paid regular holidays, unless the working days in the establishment as a matter of practice or policy, or that provided in the employment contract is less than 12 months, in which case said period shall be considered as one year. Accordingly, private respondent's service incentive leave credits of five days for every year of service, based on the actual service rendered to the petitioner, in accordance with each contract of employment should be computed up to the date of reinstatement pursuant to Article 279 of the Labor Code.[26]
2005-08-08
TINGA, J.
On the other hand, service incentive leave, as provided in Art. 95 of the Labor Code, is a yearly leave benefit of five (5) days with pay, enjoyed by an employee who has rendered at least one year of service.  Unless specifically excepted, all establishments are required to grant service incentive leave to their employees.  The term "at least one year of service" shall mean service within twelve (12) months, whether continuous or broken reckoned from the date the employee started working.[41]  The Court has held in several instances that "service incentive leave is clearly  demandable after one year of service."[42]
2005-07-08
TINGA, J.
On the other hand, service incentive leave, as provided in Art. 95 of the Labor Code, is a yearly leave benefit of five (5) days with pay, enjoyed by an employee who has rendered at least one year of service.  Unless specifically excepted, all establishments are required to grant service incentive leave to their employees.  The term "at least one year of service" shall mean service within twelve (12) months, whether continuous or broken reckoned from the date the employee started working.[41] The Court has held in several instances that "service incentive leave is clearly  demandable after one year of service."[42]