This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2012-12-03 |
BRION, J. |
||||
| We find no arbitrariness in the appellate court's appreciation of the evidence on record and see no reason to disturb its conclusion on its evidentiary weight, specifically, its substantiality. We reiterate that substantial evidence is more than a mere scintilla. It is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion, even if other minds, equally reasonable, might conceivably opine otherwise.[30] | |||||