Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

	GR No. 156983 2003-09-23	IN MATTER OF APPLICATION FOR HABEAS CORPUS OF JOSE VICTOR RIGOR Y DANAO v. SUPERINTENDENT AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
The nature of petitioner's sentences does not allow its simultaneous service; hence he must serve it successively.[16] Not only that he must serve it successively, he must also serve it up to its maximum term. In the case of Angeles vs. Director of New Bilibid Prisons[17] cited by petitioner, the petition for habeas corpus was not granted because it appeared that petitioner has only served the minimum of his sentence.