Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

PEOPLE v. CARLO ELLASOS Y MAURICIO

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR NO. 160188 2007-06-21	ARISTOTEL VALENZUELA Y NATIVIDAD v. PEOPLE TINGA, J.
Indeed, we have, after all, held that unlawful taking, or apoderamiento, is deemed complete from the moment the offender gains possession of the thing, even if he has no opportunity to dispose of the same.[92] And long ago, we asserted in People v. Avila:[93]
	GR Nos. 144086-87 2002-02-06	PEOPLE v. EDRALIN TABOGA YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
Direct evidence of the commission of the crime is not the only matrix wherefrom a court may draw its conclusions and findings of guilt.[21] The rules on evidence[22] and case law sustain the conviction of the accused through circumstantial evidence when the following requisites concur: (1) there must be more than one circumstance; (2) the facts from which the inferences are derived are proven; and (3) the combination of all circumstances is such as to produce a conviction beyond reasonable doubt of the guilt of the accused.[23]
	GR No. 137457 2001-11-21	PEOPLE v. ROSAURO SIA Y DICHOSO YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
Direct evidence of the commission of the crime is not the only matrix wherefrom a court may draw its conclusions and findings of guilt.[19] The rules on evidence[20] and case law sustain the conviction of the accused through circumstantial evidence when the following requisites concur: (1) there must be more than one circumstance; (2) the facts from which the inferences are derived are proven; and (3) the combination of all circumstances is such as to produce a conviction beyond reasonable doubt of the guilt of the accused.[21]