You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP

RE: REPORT ON JUDICIAL AUDIT CONDUCTED IN RTC

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

Add checked cases to Casebook

AM NO. MTJ-04-1554
2005-06-29
DR. WILSON B. TAN v. JUDGE ANTONIO T. ESTOCONING
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
As found by the OCA, the cases subject of the present administrative complaints were not reflected in the required monthly reports particularly under the list of cases submitted for decision.  Erroneous statistical accomplishment of the monthly report is equivalent to the submission of inaccurate report making the same a ground for disciplinary action.[28] Proper and efficient court management is the responsibility of the judge.[29]