This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2003-06-18 |
SANDOVAL-GUTIERREZ, J. |
||||
| (3) sufficient lapse of time between the decision and the execution to allow the accused to reflect upon the consequence of his act.[42] When it is not shown how and when the plan to kill was hatched or what time had elapsed before it was carried out, evident premeditation cannot be considered.[43] Here, we cannot discern from the records the presence of the foregoing essential element. | |||||