You're currently signed in as:
User

ERMELINDA ESCLEO v. MARITESS DORADO

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2004-11-23
TINGA, J,
The Court has repeatedly held that everyone in the judiciary, from the presiding judge to the clerk, must always be beyond reproach and must be circumscribed with the heavy burden of responsibility as to let them be free of any suspicion that may taint the judiciary.[20] As the Court explained in Mirano v. Saavedra:[21]