You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP

RE: IMPOSITION OF CORRESPONDING PENALTIES ON FOLLOWING EMPLOYEES OF THIS COURT FOR HABITUAL TARDINESS COMMITTED DURING SECOND SEMESTER OF 2000: FE MALOU B. CASTELO

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

Add checked cases to Casebook

AM No. 00-06-09-SC
2004-03-16
RE: IMPOSITION OF CORRESPONDING PENALTIES FOR HABITUAL TARDINESS COMMITTED DURING FIRST
SANDOVAL-GUTIERREZ, J.
financial concerns are not sufficient reasons to excuse habitual tardiness.[11] Under Sec. 52 (C) (4), Rule VI of CSC Memorandum Circular No. 19, Series of 1999,[12] habitual tardiness is penalized as follows: First Offense Reprimand