Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 156541 2009-02-23	LUZ CAJIGAS v. PEOPLE CARPIO, J.
In Criminal Case No. RTC-1411, the total value of the dishonored checks is P33,758.21 while in Criminal Case No. RTC-1412, the total value of the checks is P55,000. Considering that the total face value of the checks in both criminal cases exceeds P22,000, the penalty of reclusion temporal should be imposed in its maximum period, which is from 17 years, 4 months and 1 day to 20 years, adding one year for each additional P10,000.[37] Accordingly, in Criminal Case No. RTC-1411, one year is added to 20 years, for a total of 21 years of reclusion perpetua. In Criminal Case No. RTC-1412, three years are added to 20 years, for a total of 23 years of reclusion perpetua.
	GR No. 173473 2008-12-17	PEOPLE v. BETH TEMPORADA YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
People v. Romero,[38] De Carlos v. Court of Appeals,[39] Salazar v. People,[40] People v. Dinglasan[41] and, by analogy, People v. Dela Cruz[42] do not support the formula being proposed by the dissent.
	GR No. 157039 2004-10-01	PEOPLE v. JOSEFINA M. DIMALANTA YNARES-SATIAGO, J.
The elements of this form of Estafa are: (1) postdating or issuing a check in payment of an obligation contracted at the time the check was issued; (2) lack of sufficient funds to cover the check; (3) knowledge on the part of the offender of such circumstances; and (4) damage to the complainant.[14]