This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2005-09-30 |
TINGA, J. |
||||
| So, too, should the prayer for the issuance of a writ of prohibition contained in the same petition be denied. Writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus are prerogative writs of equity and their granting is ordinarily within the sound discretion of the courts to be exercised on equitable principles. Said writs should only be issued when the right to the relief is clear.[33] As our findings in this case confirm, the homeowners association failed to establish a clear legal right to the issuance of the writs of mandamus and prohibition prayed for. | |||||
|
2003-09-18 |
YNARES-SANTIAGO, J. |
||||
| In Spouses Caviles v. Court of Appeals,[26] we recognized the predicament that confronts a mortgagor seeking to restrain the extra-judicial foreclosure of mortgages arising from a single transaction but concerning properties found in different provinces. Thus - | |||||