Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 144589 2003-06-16	PEOPLE v. JUANITO PACUANCUAN PANGANIBAN, J.
It is a well-settled rule that the evaluation of the credibility of witnesses and their testimonies is best undertaken by trial judges, who have the unique opportunity to observe the witnesses firsthand and to note their demeanor and conduct on the witness stand. For this reason, their findings on such matters, absent any arbitrariness or oversight of facts or circumstances of weight and substance, are final and conclusive upon this Court and will not be disturbed on appeal.[17]
	GR No. 139576 2002-09-02	PEOPLE v. ROGER OR ROGELIO PUEDAN PANGANIBAN, J.
findings on such matters, absent any arbitrariness or oversight of facts or circumstances of weight and substance, are final and conclusive upon this Court and will not to be disturbed on appeal.[15] In this case, the RTC found the prosecution witnesses to be credible and convincing. It observed that Tulo, Reymark and Erlinda were candid and straightforward in relating their versions of the stabbing incident. Tulo narrated that he was outside his house fashioning a mortar