This case has been cited 4 times or more.
|
2007-03-13 |
CARPIO MORALES, J. |
||||
| On May 9, 2000[6] and May 29, 2000,[7] respondent submitted to petitioner DOH a request for the inclusion of additional items in its list of accredited drug products, including the antibiotic "Penicillin G Benzathine." Based on the schedule provided by petitioner DOH, it appears that processing of and release of the result of respondent's request were due on September 2000, the last month of the quarter following the date of its filing.[8] | |||||
|
2004-02-05 |
SANDOVAL-GUTIERREZ, J. |
||||
| Moreover, Jovita's testimony that appellant sexually assaulted her on December 8 and 9, 1996 is sustained by the Medico-Legal Officer's findings that the deep-healed lacerations at 3:00 and 9:00 o'clock positions found in her hymen could have been inflicted about 20 days before the genital examination on December 27, 1996; and that they could have been caused by the insertion of a hard blunt object like an erect penis. The victim's credible testimony, corroborated by the medical findings, is more than sufficient to establish the essential requisite of carnal knowledge.[22] | |||||
|
2003-10-23 |
PER CURIAM |
||||
| Appellant's bare allegation that he did not abuse his daughter must fail. The defense of denial is weak and must certainly fall when placed astride the victim's positive assertions. Being evidence that is negative and self-serving in nature, disavowals cannot secure more worthiness than the testimonies of prosecution witnesses who testified on clear and positive evidence.[23] | |||||
|
2001-10-23 |
QUISUMBING, J. |
||||
| Having met the test of credibility and reliability, we find the testimony of complainants, coupled with the testimony and medical findings of Dr. Nieves, more than sufficient to establish the essential requisite of illicit carnal knowledge under the provisions of Article 335 of the Revised Penal Code.[35] | |||||