This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2006-04-10 |
CALLEJO, SR., J. |
||||
| The appellate court, the NLRC and the Labor Arbiter are thus one in finding that respondents were not project employees, and in sustaining respondents' claim of illegal dismissal due to petitioners' failure to adduce contrary evidence. Well-settled is the rule that findings of fact of quasi-judicial agencies, like the NLRC, are accorded not only respect but at times even finality if such findings are supported by substantial evidence. Such findings of facts can only be set aside upon showing of grave abuse of discretion, fraud or error of law,[32] none of which have been shown in this case. | |||||