Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 170008 2009-01-19	DUTCH BOY PHILIPPINES v. RONALD SENIEL SUBSTITUTED BY LIGAYA QUIMPO NACHURA, J.
Good faith is always presumed, and it is the burden of the party claiming otherwise to adduce clear and convincing evidence to the contrary. No judgment for damages could arise where the source of injury, be it fraud, fault, or negligence, was not affirmatively established by competent evidence.[33]
	GR NO. 173192 2008-04-18	ROSENDO BACALSO v. MAXIMO PADIGOS CARPIO MORALES, J.
Forgery, as any other mechanism of fraud, must be proved clearly and convincingly, and the burden of proof lies on the party alleging forgery.[38]
	GR NO. 142941 2006-06-26	NATIONAL TRUCKING v. RIGHT FORWARDERS CORPORATION CORONA, J.
This case falls under one of the exceptions to the rule that this Court does not review the findings of fact of the lower courts. There being contradictory factual findings as to who was responsible for the collision and who should pay damages to petitioners, we pass on the facts and evidence of the case.[4]