This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2012-04-11 |
BERSAMIN, J. |
||||
| If it is already clear that Go and Guivencan had not themselves seen the execution or signing of the documents,the Prosecution surely did not authenticate Exhibits B to YY and their derivatives conformably with the aforequoted rules. Hence, Exhibits B to YY, and their derivatives, inclusive, were inescapably bereft of probative value as evidence. That was the only fair and just result, as the Court held in Malayan Insurance Co., Inc. v. Philippine Nails and Wires Corporation:[38] | |||||