Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 149638 2014-12-10	MONCAYO INTEGRATED SMALL-SCALE MINERS ASSOCIATION v. SOUTHEAST MINDANAO GOLD MINING CORP. LEONEN, J.
Second, the 1991 Apex Mining v. Garcia case "was decided on facts and issues that were not attendant in [Apex Mining v. SMGMC], such as the expiration of EP 133, the violation of the condition embodied in EP 133 prohibiting its assignment, and the unauthorized and invalid assignment of EP 133 by [Marcopper] to [SMGMC], since this assignment was effected without the approval of the Secretary of DENR."[74]
	GR No. 149638 2014-12-10	MONCAYO INTEGRATED SMALL-SCALE MINERS ASSOCIATION v. SOUTHEAST MINDANAO GOLD MINING CORP. LEONEN, J.
Apex Mining v. SMGMC discussed that "Section 5 of Republic Act No. 7942 is a special provision, as it specifically treats of the establishment of mineral reservations only. Said provision grants the President the power to proclaim a mineral land as a mineral reservation, regardless of whether such land is also an existing forest reservation."[107]