Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

	GR No. 168979 2013-12-02	REBECCA PACAÑA-CONTRERAS v. ROVILA WATER SUPPLY BRION, J.
However, in the cases of Quilatan, et al. v. Heirs of Quilatan, et al.[66] and Lagunilla, et al. v. Monis, et al.,[67] the Court remanded the case to the RTC for the impleading of indispensable parties. On the other hand, in Lotte Phil. Co., Inc. v. Dela Cruz,[68] PepsiCo, Inc. v. Emerald Pizza,[69] and Valdez-Tallorin, v. Heirs of Tarona, et al.,[70] the Court directly ordered that the indispensable parties be impleaded.