Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 141336 2004-06-29	RODOLFO G. VALENCIA v. SANDIGANBAYAN YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
As a general proposition, a motion to quash on the ground that the allegations of the information do not constitute the offense charged, or any offense for that matter, should be resolved on the basis alone of said allegations whose truth and veracity are hypothetically admitted. The informations need only state the ultimate facts; the reasons therefor could be proved during the trial.[24]
	GR Nos. 146368-69 2003-10-23	MADELEINE MENDOZA-ONG v. SANDIGANBAYAN QUISUMBING, J.
The fundamental test of the viability of a motion to quash on the ground that the facts averred in the information do not amount to an offense is whether the facts alleged would establish the essential elements of the crime as defined by law. In this examination, matters aliunde are not considered.[15]