You're currently signed in as:
User

PEOPLE v. CONRADO SALADINO Y DINGLE

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

2008-07-23
CORONA, J.
On July 15, 1989, respondent Dr. Pedro Zaldivar, as legal possessor[3] of Lot No. 7481-H[4] situated in Mapatag, Hamtic, Antique, entered into an agreement (Kasugtanan)[5] with Salmorin designating him as administrator of the lot with a monthly salary of P150. Salmorin allegedly did not comply with the terms of the Kasugtanan when he failed to till the vacant areas.[6] This compelled Zaldivar to terminate his services and eject him from the lot. When Salmorin refused to vacate the property, Zaldivar filed a complaint for unlawful detainer against him in the Municipal Circuit Trial Court (MCTC) of Tobias Fornier-Anini-y-Hamtic. The complaint was docketed as Civil Case No. 229-H.
2001-12-14
PANGANIBAN, J.
To the depraved mind of appellant, complainant's failure to resist or to shout may have been a sign of consent. But in the crime of rape, what is given paramount consideration is the state of mind of the victim, not of the perpetrator.[27]
2001-11-29
MENDOZA, J.
Indeed, no young girl would falsely accuse her uncle of a heinous crime, willingly undergo an examination of her private parts, and expose herself to a public trial, unless she is motivated by a desire to seek justice for the wrong committed against her.[17] In the case of Vanessa Rochelle, she had no reason to make false charges against accused-appellant. Where no evidence has been shown that the victim had improper motive to falsely implicate the accused in the commission of the crime, the presumption is that no such ill motive exists and her testimony is worthy of full faith and credence.[18]