You're currently signed in as:
User

EXUPERANCIO CANTA v. PEOPLE

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2007-07-09
NACHURA, J.
Conviction for cattle-rustling necessitates the concurrence of the following elements: (1) large cattle is taken; (2) it belongs to another; (3) the taking is done without the consent of the owner or raiser; (4) the taking is done by any means, method or scheme; (5) the taking is done with or without intent to gain; and (6) the taking is accomplished with or without violence or intimidation against persons or force upon things.[50] Considering that the gravamen of the crime is the taking or killing of large cattle or taking its meat or hide without the consent of the owner or raiser,[51] conviction for the same need only be supported by the fact of taking without the cattle owner's consent.