Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	AM No. RTJ-07-2075 2008-04-18	ATTY. UBALDINO A. LACUROM v. JUDGE JUANITA C. TIENZO NACHURA, J.
Indeed, as a matter of public policy, not every error or mistake committed by judges in the performance of their official duties renders them administratively liable.[11] In the absence of fraud, dishonesty or deliberate intent to do an injustice, acts done in their official capacity, even though erroneous, do not always constitute misconduct.[12]
	AM No. RTJ-07-2075 2007-10-09	ATTY. UBALDINO A. LACUROM v. JUDGE JUANITA C. TIENZO NACHURA, J.
Indeed, as a matter of public policy, not every error or mistake committed by judges in the performance of their official duties renders them administratively liable.[11] In the absence of fraud, dishonesty or deliberate intent to do an injustice, acts done in their official capacity, even though erroneous, do not always constitute misconduct.[12]