You're currently signed in as:
User

MANUEL GO CINCO v. CA

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

2013-07-24
DEL CASTILLO, J.
"Tender of payment, without more, produces no effect."[34]  "[T]o have the effect of payment and the consequent extinguishment of the obligation to pay, the law requires the companion acts of tender of payment and consignation."[35]
2011-06-29
DEL CASTILLO, J.
Likewise flawed is petitioners' reasoning that TCT Nos. T-225131 and T-225132 could not have been included in the list of properties mortgaged as these were still mortgaged with the PNB at that time.  Under our laws, a mortgagor is allowed to take a second or subsequent mortgage on a property already mortgaged, subject to the prior rights of the previous mortgages. [40]