Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR Nos. 159561-62 2012-10-03	R.V. SANTOS COMPANY v. BELLE CORPORATION LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J.
Other recognized exceptions are as follows: (1) when there is a very clear showing of grave abuse of discretion resulting in lack or loss of jurisdiction as when a party was deprived of a fair opportunity to present its position before the Arbitral Tribunal or when an award is obtained through fraud or the corruption of arbitrators, (2) when the findings of the Court of Appeals are contrary to those of the CIAC, and (3) when a party is deprived of administrative due process.[31] (Citations omitted.)
	GR No. 172525 2010-10-20	SHINRYO COMPANY v. RRN INCORPORATED PERALTA, J.
As reiterated by the Court in IBEX International, Inc. v. Government Service Insurance System,[5] to wit: It is settled that findings of fact of quasi-judicial bodies, which have acquired expertise because their jurisdiction is confined to specific matters, are generally accorded not only respect, but also finality, especially when affirmed by the Court of Appeals. In particular, factual findings of construction arbitrators are final and conclusive and not reviewable by this Court on appeal.