This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2016-01-11 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| The destructive acts of petitioners, however, find no legal sanction. This Court has ruled time and again that no public official is above the law.[31] The Court of Appeals correctly ruled that although petitioners claim to have merely performed an abatement of a public nuisance, the same was done summarily while failing to follow the proper procedure therefor and for which, petitioners must be held administratively liable. | |||||