This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2015-07-08 |
PEREZ, J. |
||||
| Needless to say, the foregoing does not affect the earlier findings of this Court on the guilt of the appellant for the crime of rape committed on 28 August 2002. To repeat, not only is the impregnation of the rape victim not an element of rape;[45] it must also be stressed that AAA stated that the appellant repeatedly rape her since 1999 until 28 August 2002.[46] Although the appellant cannot be held liable for such alleged rapes, as this case does not cover other incidents of rape prior to 28 August 2002, AAA’s testimony on this point provides a possible explanation for her childbirth on 5 January 2003 as her child turned one on 5 January 2004.[47] | |||||