Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 198356 2015-04-20	SUPAPO v. SPS. ROBERTO AND SUSAN DE JESUS BRION, J.
"Bar by prior judgment" means that when a right or fact had already been judicially tried on the merits and determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, the final judgment or order shall be conclusive upon the parties and those in privity with them and constitutes an absolute bar to subsequent actions involving the same claim, demand or cause of action.[63]
	GR No. 207376 2014-08-06	AIDA PADILLA v. GLOBE ASIATIQUE REALTY HOLDINGS CORPORATION VILLARAMA, JR., J.
The above ruling was applied in Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation v. Royal Cargo Corporation[40] where we granted petitioner's prayer for attorney's fees under its Compulsory Counterclaim notwithstanding the dismissal of the complaint.
	GR No. 167050 2011-06-01	SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSION v. RIZAL POULTRY PEREZ, J.
Res judicata embraces two concepts: (1) bar by prior judgment as enunciated in Rule 39, Section 47(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure; and (2) conclusiveness of judgment in Rule 39, Section 47(c).[14]