This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2004-06-03 |
CARPIO, J. |
||||
| In the more recent case of Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Court of Appeals,[22] we held that Liboro's clarification of Lacsamana is consistent with the Revised Internal Rules of the Court of Appeals and Supreme Court Circular No. 1-91. They all allow an extension of time for filing petitions for review with the Court of Appeals. The extension, however, should be limited to only fifteen days save in exceptionally meritorious cases where the Court of Appeals may grant a longer period. | |||||