Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 158312 2008-11-14	JOHN DY v. PEOPLE QUISUMBING, J.
In Tan v. People,[38] this Court acquitted the petitioner therein who was indicted under B.P. Blg. 22, upon a check which was dishonored for the reason DAUD, among others. We observed that:In the second place, even without relying on the credit line, petitioner's bank account covered the check she issued because even though there were some deposits that were still uncollected the deposits became "good" and the bank certified that the check was "funded."[39]
	GR No. 148557 2003-08-07	FELICITO ABARQUEZ v. CA YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
In Tan v. People,[21] we held that even with uncollected deposits, the bank may honor the check at its discretion in favor of clients, in which case there would be no violation of B.P. Blg. 22. Corollarily, if the bank so desires, it could likewise dishonor the check if drawn against uncollected deposits, in which case the drawer could be held liable for violation of BP Blg. 22.