Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 180050 2011-04-12	RODOLFO G. NAVARRO v. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY EDUARDO ERMITA NACHURA, J.
CHAIRMAN LINA. Well, as I said, we are going to consider this very seriously and even with sympathy because of the explanation given and we will study this very carefully.[29]
	GR No. 175393 2009-12-18	GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM v. RTC OF PASIG CITY LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J.
The doctrine of finality of judgments accepts of exceptions only under certain circumstances, as we have held in Spouses Gomez v. Correa, et al., [59] : It is settled that when a final judgment is executory, it becomes immutable and unalterable. The judgment may no longer be modified in any respect, even if the modification is meant to correct what is perceived to be an erroneous conclusion of fact or law, and regardless of whether the modification is attempted to be made by the court rendering it or by the highest Court of the land. The doctrine is founded on considerations of public policy and sound practice that, at the risk of occasional errors, judgments must become final at some definite point in time.