This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2009-04-29 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| Indeed, the law permits, on many occasions, the appointment of non-CES eligibles to CES positions in the government[34] in the absence of appropriate eligibles and when there is necessity in the interest of public service to fill vacancies in the government.[35] But in all such cases, the appointment is at best merely temporary[36] as it is said to be conditioned on the subsequent obtention of the required CES eligibility.[37] This rule, according to De Leon v. Court of Appeals,[38] Dimayuga v. Benedicto,[39] Caringal v. Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office,[40] and Achacoso v. Macaraig,[41] is invariable even though the given appointment may have been designated as permanent by the appointing authority. | |||||
|
2002-08-29 |
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J. |
||||
| The Achacoso case, penned by Justice Isagani Cruz in 1991, laid down the jurisprudential basis in cases involving security of tenure in career executive service positions.[25] Simply put, it was ruled therein that a CES eligibility is required | |||||