Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 203372 2015-06-16	ATTY. CHELOY E. VELICARIA- GARAFIL v. OFFICE OF PRESIDENT CARPIO, J.
In particular, in the CA’s cited Nazareno v. City of Dumaguete,[103] the Court upheld the Civil Service Commission’s (CSC’s) issuance that generally prohibited outgoing local chief executives from exercising their appointing power unless certain requirements, evidencing regularity of the appointment, are observed.[104] In Sales v. Carreon,[105] the Court supported the CSC’s nullification of the appointments made by the outgoing local chief executive because it was made in disregard of civil service laws and rules, not because of an express prohibition against appointment per se.
	GR No. 207682 2014-12-10	CONRADO B. NICART v. MA. JOSEFINA C. TITONG VELASCO JR., J.
There, petitioner, in the main, argues that the appointments were in violation ofsaid Section 21 of CSC Memorandum Circular No. 16, s. 2007 and that the exemptions laid down in Nazareno v City of Dumaguete[4] were not met for the following reasons: (a) there was no need to fill up the vacancies immediately; and (b) the appointments were made en masse.