You're currently signed in as:
User

NATIVIDAD CANDIDO v. RICARDO CAMACHO

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

2003-08-21
PANGANIBAN, J.
Such move clearly constitutes forum-shopping. As held by Candido v. Camacho,[33] forum-shopping exists "when a party repetitively avails himself of several judicial remedies in different venues, simultaneously or successively, all substantially founded on the same transactions, essential facts and circumstances, all raising substantially the same issues and involving exactly the same parties."[34]
2003-03-26
YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
Considering that respondent was indubitably guilty of forum-shopping when he filed SPR No. 37-2002, his petition should have been dismissed outright by the COMELEC.[18] Willful and deliberate forum-shopping is a ground for summary dismissal of the case, and constitutes direct contempt of court.[19]
2002-12-17
SANDOVAL-GUTIERREZ, J.
instant complaint is impermissible. It is worthwhile to note that defendants' petition for certiorari was granted by the RTC. In fact, it issued a preliminary injunction restraining the MTC from enforcing its writ of execution.[11]  Aggrieved by the RTC decision, plaintiff