This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2011-08-31 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| Hence, upon his conviction, petitioner's remedy should have been an appeal to the Sandiganbayan. There is nothing in said paragraph which can conceivably justify the filing of petitioner's appeal before the Court of Appeals instead of the Sandiganbayan. Clearly, the Court of Appeals is bereft of any jurisdiction to review the judgment petitioner seeks to appeal.[17] | |||||