Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR Nos. 212536-37 2014-08-27	CIR v. PHILIPPINE AIRLINES VELASCO JR., J.
That the Legislature chose not to amend or repeal [PD] 1590 even after PAL was privatized reveals the intent of the Legislature to let PAL continue to enjoy, as a private corporation, the very same rights and privileges under the terms and conditions stated in said charter.[10] x x x
	GR No. 179259 2013-09-25	CIR v. PHILIPPINE AIRLINES PEREZ, J.
The franchise tax, on the other hand, shall be 2% of the gross revenues derived by respondent from all sources, whether transport or nontransport operations. However, with respect to international air-transport service, the franchise tax shall only be imposed on the gross passenger, mail, and freight revenues of respondent from its outgoing flights.[21]