This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2012-06-27 |
SERENO, J. |
||||
| Neither can we deem petitioner Lagua's Motion for Reconsideration with Motion to Admit Appellant's Brief as substantial compliance with the procedural requirement. In Cariño v. Espinoza,[18] the appellate court rightly disallowed the submission of the Appellant's Brief after a delay of seven months. In this case, it took petitioner almost two years from 26 February 2004 (after the CA gave him a second non-extendible period of 45 days) to finally submit his Appellant's Brief on 19 December 2005. | |||||