You're currently signed in as:
User

ROQUE R. MARTINEZ v. NORVELL R. LIM

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2011-11-29
PER CURIAM
We note that the respondent also violated PD No. 26. The franking privilege granted by PD No. 26 extended only to judges and referred to official communications and papers directly connected with the conduct of judicial proceedings which shall be transmitted in the mail free of charge.[22] The respondent was not a judge nor were the eight demand letters related to the discharge of judicial functions.