Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	AM No. MTJ-09-1737 2011-02-09	LYDELLE L. CONQUILLA v. JUDGE LAURO G. BERNARDO CARPIO, J.
The Court notes that this is respondent judge's third offense. In 2003, the Court found respondent judge administratively liable for undue delay in rendering decisions and fined him P19,000, with a stern warning that a repetition of similar acts would be dealt with more severely.[13]
	AM No. 02-10-628-RTC 2004-10-01	REPORT ON JUDICIAL AUDIT CONDUCTED IN RTC AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
It is not uncommon for this Court, upon proper application and in meritorious cases, especially when difficult questions of law or complex issues are involved, to grant judges of lower courts additional time to decide beyond the 90-day period.[19] All that a judge really needs to do, in cases of great difficulty, is to request for an extension of time over which the Court has, almost invariably, been sympathetic.[20] Judge Libre, however, did not avail of such remedy, which only manifests his failure to be on top of the cases assigned to him.