This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2010-12-07 |
BRION, J. |
||||
| As the records show, no evidence exists showing that the respondent previously interfered with the sales application covering Manuel's land when the former was still a member of the Committee on Awards. The complainant, too, failed to sufficiently establish that the respondent was engaged in the practice of law. At face value, the legal service rendered by the respondent was limited only in the preparation of a single document. In Borja, Sr. v. Sulyap, Inc.,[32] we specifically described private practice of law as one that contemplates a succession of acts of the same nature habitually or customarily holding one's self to the public as a lawyer. | |||||