This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2013-09-04 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| The above ruling already binds private respondents, considering that Alfonso Aguinaldo Non and Concepcion Non Andres were both their predecessors-in-interest because they are their grandfather and mother, respectively.[49] As a matter of fact, in Andres v. Majaducon,[50] which is an administrative case filed by Sergio and Gracelda Andres, who are private respondents herein, against Clerk of Court and Ex-Officio Provincial Sheriff Lastimosa and Sheriff Palati for alleged abuse of authority when they enforced the order of demolition against them (private respondents) even though they were not impleaded as parties in Civil Case Nos. 1291 and 4647, We dismissed the charge and instead ruled:Worth quoting here is the decision of the CA in CA-G.R. CV No. 54003, which decided the appeal of the decision in Civil Case No. 4647, viz.: | |||||