This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2008-07-23 |
VELASCO JR., J. |
||||
| Ventures' allegations on forum shopping and the procedural lapse supposedly committed by the BLR in allowing a belatedly filed motion for reconsideration need not detain us long. Suffice it to state that this Court has consistently ruled that the application of technical rules of procedure in labor cases may be relaxed to serve the demands of substantial justice.[26] So it must be in this case. | |||||
|
2005-10-20 |
QUISUMBING, J. |
||||
| Thus, mindful that the greater interest of justice would be served if the petition is adjudicated on its merits,[17] we will proceed with the remaining issues, and discuss them jointly. | |||||