Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

RUDY LAO v. STANDARD INSURANCE CO.

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 194328 2015-07-01	STRONGHOLD INSURANCE COMPANY v. INTERPACIFIC CONTAINER SERVICES PEREZ, J.
What further dampens petitioner's position is the absence of the crucial fact of intoxication in the blotter report which officially documented the incident. Entries in police records made by a police officer in the performance of the duty especially enjoined by law are prima facie evidence of the fact therein stated, and their probative value may be substantiated or nullified by other competent evidence.[13] In this case, the lack of statement to the effect that the driver was under the influence of alcohol in the said report is too significant to escape the attention of this Court.
	GR No. 193421 2014-06-04	MCMER CORPORATION v. NLRC PERALTA, J.
It must be remembered that although police blotters are of little probative value, they are nevertheless admitted and considered in the absence of competent evidence to refute the facts stated therein.[37] Entries in police records made by a police officer in the performance of the duty especially enjoined by law are prima facie evidence of the fact therein stated, and their probative value may be either substantiated or nullified by other competent evidence.[38]
	GR NO. 146635 2005-12-14	MARCELO MACALINAO v. EDDIE MEDECIELO ONG TINGA, J.
While true in most instances, it must still be remembered that although police blotters are of little probative value, they are nevertheless admitted and considered in the absence of competent evidence to refute the facts stated therein.[32] Entries in police records made by a police officer in the performance of the duty especially enjoined by law are prima facie evidence of the fact therein stated,[33] and their probative value may be either substantiated or nullified by other competent evidence.[34]