This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2009-06-30 |
VELASCO JR., J. |
||||
| A review of subsequent and recent rulings by this Court shows that the pronouncement in Herbieto has been applied to Buenaventura v. Republic,[17] Republic v. Diloy,[18] Ponciano, Jr. v. Laguna Lake Development Authority,[19] and Preciosa v. Pascual.[20] This Court's ruling in Naguit, on the other hand, has been applied to Republic v. Bibonia.[21] | |||||
|
2009-03-30 |
CARPIO MORALES, J. |
||||
| It is a hornbook doctrine that the 15-day reglementary period for filing a motion for reconsideration is non-extendible. Provisions of the Rules of Court prescribing the time within which certain acts must be done or certain proceedings taken are considered absolutely indispensable to the prevention of needless delays and to the orderly and speedy discharge of judicial businesses and strict compliance with such rules is mandatory and imperative.[13] | |||||