This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2008-11-25 |
REYES, R.T., J. |
||||
| Further, to hold a judge administratively accountable for every erroneous rule or decision he renders would be nothing short of harassment and would make his position doubly unbearable. To hold otherwise would be to render judicial office untenable, for no one called upon to try the facts or interpret the law in the process of the administration of justice can be infallible in his judgment.[3] | |||||
|
2005-06-08 |
TINGA, J. |
||||
| An administrative complaint is not the appropriate remedy for every irregular or erroneous order or decision issued by a judge where a judicial remedy is available such as the special civil actions of certiorari and prohibition resorted to in both the Corporate Case and the Criminal Case. If subsequent developments prove the judge's challenged act to be correct, there would be no occasion to proceed against him at all.[39] Marilou filed the instant administrative complaint before ascertaining the foundation therefor. | |||||