Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 173038 2011-09-14	ELENA JANE DUARTE v. MIGUEL SAMUEL A.E. DURAN DEL CASTILLO, J.
Preponderance of evidence only requires that evidence be greater or more convincing than the opposing evidence.[1]
	GR No. 172547 2009-06-30	PRECY BUNYI v. FE S. FACTOR QUISUMBING, J.
All things considered, this Court finds that respondent Fe S. Factor successfully proved the extent and character of her possession over the disputed property. As a consequence of her ownership thereof, respondent is entitled to its possession, considering petitioners' failure to prove prior possession. The Court stresses, however, that its determination of ownership in the instant case is not final. It is only a provisional determination for the sole purpose of resolving the issue of possession. It would not bar or prejudice a separate action between the same parties involving the quieting of title to the subject property.[29]