Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 4 times or more.

	GR No. 209464 2015-07-01	DANDY L. DUNGO v. PEOPLE MENDOZA, J.
It is evident that the Information need not use the exact language of the statute in alleging the acts or omissions complained of as constituting the offense. The test is whether it enables a person of common understanding to know the charge against him, and the court to render judgment properly.[92]
	GR No. 205180 2013-11-11	RYAN VIRAY v. PEOPLE VELASCO JR., J.
That it be done with grave abuse of confidence.[34]
	GR No. 193250 2012-04-25	PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. AMELIO TRIA VELASCO JR., J.
In the instant case, the first and second elements are unquestionably present. The money involved is the personal property of Tria's employer, PNB. Tria's argument that the amount does not belong to PNB even if it is the depositary bank is erroneous since it is well established that a bank acquires ownership of the money deposited by its clients.[36]
	GR No. 193479 2011-10-19	PEOPLE v. BERNARD G. MIRTO VELASCO JR., J.
That it be done with grave abuse of confidence.[14] (Emphasis supplied.)